+- 2DWorlds Forums (http://2dworlds.buildism.net/forum)
+-- Forum: 2DWorlds (http://2dworlds.buildism.net/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=4)
+--- Forum: 2DWorlds Discussion (http://2dworlds.buildism.net/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=10)
+--- Thread: Bring Back Negative Reps (/showthread.php?tid=693)
RE: Bring Back Negative Reps - Ghosty - 03-13-2013
Well... I suppose you do have a point.
I'm still against it.
But it maybe it wouldn't be too terrible if negative reps are re-allowed. I still think it would just add another layer of drama to the dramafest that this place is. But, that's not my fault. One can only punish bad behavior, not command everyone ever to stop it and expect them to behave. And sometimes, that punishing might have to take a dozen or two clicks instead of a lazy one or two button pushes. If you want a potential drama source that has potential usefulness, I guess you have every right to try it. And if I have to clean up the mess that gets left behind, so be it.
RE: Bring Back Negative Reps - Oak - 03-13-2013
I've never seen the point of virtual reputation scoring systems.
It's pointless.
RE: Bring Back Negative Reps - ijfeswijfae - 03-16-2013
(03-13-2013, 12:12 PM)Oak Wrote: I've never seen the point of virtual reputation scoring systems.
It's pointless.
You can say the same for post counts, or skins, or even this site's existence, but your opinion will obviously be disregarded if that's the only thing you have to say.
Anyways, negative reps are still not back on.
"I still think it would just add another layer of drama to the dramafest that this place is."
I don't think anyone should have anything to fear from the thing that has gave this site its activity.
RE: Bring Back Negative Reps - Oak - 03-16-2013
I think my reputation was -11 on Walrus on Buildism, as I remember.
RE: Bring Back Negative Reps - ijfeswijfae - 03-16-2013
(03-16-2013, 12:20 PM)Oak Wrote: I think my reputation was -11 on Walrus on Buildism, as I remember.
And that's relevant because...?
RE: Bring Back Negative Reps - Oak - 03-17-2013
(03-16-2013, 10:30 PM)Myem Wrote:(03-16-2013, 12:20 PM)Oak Wrote: I think my reputation was -11 on Walrus on Buildism, as I remember.
And that's relevant because...?
This thread is about bringing back negative reputations.
My post was about me having a negative reputation in the past.
That was completely relevant.
RE: Bring Back Negative Reps - ijfeswijfae - 03-17-2013
(03-17-2013, 01:50 AM)Oak Wrote:(03-16-2013, 10:30 PM)Myem Wrote:(03-16-2013, 12:20 PM)Oak Wrote: I think my reputation was -11 on Walrus on Buildism, as I remember.
And that's relevant because...?
This thread is about bringing back negative reputations.
My post was about me having a negative reputation in the past.
That was completely relevant.
No, it's not. It's uncalled for that you bring up such a subject without a prior argument to justify it.
Just what is the purpose of making such an outburst?
RE: Bring Back Negative Reps - Oak - 03-17-2013
(03-17-2013, 02:05 AM)Myem Wrote:(03-17-2013, 01:50 AM)Oak Wrote:(03-16-2013, 10:30 PM)Myem Wrote:(03-16-2013, 12:20 PM)Oak Wrote: I think my reputation was -11 on Walrus on Buildism, as I remember.
And that's relevant because...?
This thread is about bringing back negative reputations.
My post was about me having a negative reputation in the past.
That was completely relevant.
No, it's not. It's uncalled for that you bring up such a subject without a prior argument to justify it.
Just what is the purpose of making such an outburst?
It's funny what you consider an outburst.
A prime example of an outburst is when you say "Jews did 9/11".
RE: Bring Back Negative Reps - ijfeswijfae - 03-17-2013
(03-17-2013, 02:08 AM)Oak Wrote:(03-17-2013, 02:05 AM)Myem Wrote:(03-17-2013, 01:50 AM)Oak Wrote:(03-16-2013, 10:30 PM)Myem Wrote:(03-16-2013, 12:20 PM)Oak Wrote: I think my reputation was -11 on Walrus on Buildism, as I remember.
And that's relevant because...?
This thread is about bringing back negative reputations.
My post was about me having a negative reputation in the past.
That was completely relevant.
No, it's not. It's uncalled for that you bring up such a subject without a prior argument to justify it.
Just what is the purpose of making such an outburst?
It's funny what you consider an outburst.
A prime example of an outburst is when you say "Jews did 9/11".
But that's not relevant or appropriate to bring up because I haven't caused your definition of an outburst in months.
RE: Bring Back Negative Reps - Oak - 03-17-2013
lol ok
it wasn't relevant or appropriate for you, but in reality it was relevant and appropriate