RE: Bring Back Negative Reps - ijfeswijfae - 03-17-2013
(03-17-2013, 01:05 PM)Oak Wrote: lol ok
it wasn't relevant or appropriate for you, but in reality it was relevant and appropriate
Sure, and I can exploit that sentence to be the other way around. Either way, trying to get a response from you without ignoring my previous points is pretty hopeless so I'll end it here.
RE: Bring Back Negative Reps - Oak - 03-17-2013
ok try me
lets see your exploitation's
RE: Bring Back Negative Reps - ijfeswijfae - 03-17-2013
(03-17-2013, 11:52 PM)Oak Wrote: ok try me
lets see your exploitation's
it was relevant or appropriate for you, but in reality it wasn't relevant and appropriate
Do you really think it takes any effort to do this?
RE: Bring Back Negative Reps - Oak - 03-18-2013
(03-17-2013, 11:57 PM)Myem Wrote: (03-17-2013, 11:52 PM)Oak Wrote: ok try me
lets see your exploitation's
it was relevant or appropriate for you, but in reality it wasn't relevant and appropriate
Do you really think it takes any effort to do this?
do i really think it takes any effort to do what
RE: Bring Back Negative Reps - ijfeswijfae - 03-18-2013
(03-18-2013, 12:12 AM)Oak Wrote: (03-17-2013, 11:57 PM)Myem Wrote: (03-17-2013, 11:52 PM)Oak Wrote: ok try me
lets see your exploitation's
it was relevant or appropriate for you, but in reality it wasn't relevant and appropriate
Do you really think it takes any effort to do this?
do i really think it takes any effort to do what
OK, you're basically asking for a ban.
RE: Bring Back Negative Reps - Oak - 03-18-2013
(03-18-2013, 12:51 AM)Myem Wrote: (03-18-2013, 12:12 AM)Oak Wrote: (03-17-2013, 11:57 PM)Myem Wrote: (03-17-2013, 11:52 PM)Oak Wrote: ok try me
lets see your exploitation's
it was relevant or appropriate for you, but in reality it wasn't relevant and appropriate
Do you really think it takes any effort to do this?
do i really think it takes any effort to do what
OK, you're basically asking for a ban.
i really don't understand how i was "asking" for a ban
but ok
i cant debate on myem-propaganda, now can i?
RE: Bring Back Negative Reps - ijfeswijfae - 03-18-2013
(03-18-2013, 09:51 PM)Oak Wrote: (03-18-2013, 12:51 AM)Myem Wrote: (03-18-2013, 12:12 AM)Oak Wrote: (03-17-2013, 11:57 PM)Myem Wrote: (03-17-2013, 11:52 PM)Oak Wrote: ok try me
lets see your exploitation's
it was relevant or appropriate for you, but in reality it wasn't relevant and appropriate
Do you really think it takes any effort to do this?
do i really think it takes any effort to do what
OK, you're basically asking for a ban.
i really don't understand how i was "asking" for a ban
but ok
i cant debate on myem-propaganda, now can i?
And neither can you debate on a normal thread.
RE: Bring Back Negative Reps - Oak - 03-18-2013
>implying that by saying jews did 9/11 is debating
ok u r pro debater
RE: Bring Back Negative Reps - ijfeswijfae - 03-18-2013
(03-18-2013, 10:03 PM)Oak Wrote: >implying that by saying jews did 9/11 is debating
ok u r pro debater
>Implying this thread is about jews or 9/11
ok u r an idiot
RE: Bring Back Negative Reps - EvilOne - 03-18-2013
(03-10-2013, 10:16 PM)Myem Wrote: It's a real pain in the ass that we're only allowed to compliment each other like gay people, plus negative reps tell us what and why people would have an issue with you for particular posts and how you can improve on that.
We're allowed to swear? Damn :|
|