In order to sustain a good amount of people, we must be more leniant. - Printable Version +- 2DWorlds Forums (http://2dworlds.buildism.net/forum) +-- Forum: 2DWorlds (http://2dworlds.buildism.net/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=4) +--- Forum: Moderator Discussion (http://2dworlds.buildism.net/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=22) +--- Thread: In order to sustain a good amount of people, we must be more leniant. (/showthread.php?tid=3891) |
In order to sustain a good amount of people, we must be more leniant. - Login - 04-22-2011 Let some things slip. Don't be like other sites, because they're popular and have an excuse to not let things slip. We don't. We need to be more lenient - discuss to the user in PM before warning them, or locking a thread, be more lenient for the sake of more people! RE: In order to sustain a good amount of people, we must be more leniant. - Ice - 04-22-2011 Maybe PM them before warning or banning but I don't think so for locking/deleting threads/post. RE: In order to sustain a good amount of people, we must be more leniant. - Login - 04-24-2011 Erm, Ice, I agree with ban, but we've got to stop being so strict as of now, a lot of people think moderation is really strict, and fire is considering quitting because of this. And so are some others. RE: In order to sustain a good amount of people, we must be more leniant. - Ashely - 04-24-2011 I actually think we need to be more strict, on some things that is. I do understand your point although a warning is given to be a less "min" punishment for the user if he/sher has not got in trouble before. Plus we can also explain why in the warning. Locking threads should be on point, I dont think someone who is getting flamed wants to see that thread open about them. RE: In order to sustain a good amount of people, we must be more leniant. - Tyler - 04-25-2011 Quick! Put this in the moderator notes! |