2DWorlds Forums
About updates of buildism. - Printable Version

+- 2DWorlds Forums (http://2dworlds.buildism.net/forum)
+-- Forum: 2DWorlds (http://2dworlds.buildism.net/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=4)
+--- Forum: The Community (http://2dworlds.buildism.net/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=27)
+--- Thread: About updates of buildism. (/showthread.php?tid=8771)

Pages: 1 2


About updates of buildism. - Monkeeyo - 01-09-2012

I think Jacob should Keep adding more stuff. If he can't run the site, why run a site if the game is not even finished? You should work on the game first. Then while you are at it, you could save money to then later run the site when you are done with the game. That would give people impressions.
Wink


RE: About updates of buildism. - Mustachio - 01-09-2012

Why run a game if the site isn't finished?


RE: About updates of buildism. - Qwertygiy - 01-09-2012

(01-09-2012, 07:09 AM)monkeeyo Wrote: I think Jacob should Keep adding more stuff. If he can't run the site, why run a site if the game is not even finished? You should work on the game first. Then while you are at it, you could save money to then later run the site when you are done with the game. That would give people impressions.
Wink

That's not how Minecraft did it, and look where they are now. They had 4 million buyers before the game was "finished".


RE: About updates of buildism. - Duck - 01-09-2012

(01-09-2012, 03:16 PM)Qwertygiy Wrote:
(01-09-2012, 07:09 AM)monkeeyo Wrote: I think Jacob should Keep adding more stuff. If he can't run the site, why run a site if the game is not even finished? You should work on the game first. Then while you are at it, you could save money to then later run the site when you are done with the game. That would give people impressions.
Wink

That's not how Minecraft did it, and look where they are now. They had 4 million buyers before the game was "finished".

yes but minecraft is a bad example because it is the only game to pull that off


RE: About updates of buildism. - Qwertygiy - 01-09-2012

(01-09-2012, 03:26 PM)Duck Wrote: yes but minecraft is a bad example because it is the only game to pull that off

Sploder is still in beta.



RE: About updates of buildism. - Duck - 01-09-2012

(01-09-2012, 03:43 PM)Qwertygiy Wrote:
(01-09-2012, 03:26 PM)Duck Wrote: yes but minecraft is a bad example because it is the only game to pull that off

Sploder is still in beta.

I've never heard of Sploder
--
Just looked at it, fair enough it seems popular


RE: About updates of buildism. - Paradox - 01-09-2012

(01-09-2012, 04:00 PM)Duck Wrote:
(01-09-2012, 03:43 PM)Qwertygiy Wrote:
(01-09-2012, 03:26 PM)Duck Wrote: yes but minecraft is a bad example because it is the only game to pull that off

Sploder is still in beta.

I've never heard of Sploder
--
Just looked at it, fair enough it seems popular

I've been told that Roblox is still in alpha.


RE: About updates of buildism. - Qwertygiy - 01-09-2012

(01-09-2012, 09:19 PM)Paradox Wrote: I've been told that Roblox is still in alpha.

Then you were misinformed.


RE: About updates of buildism. - Paradox - 01-09-2012

(01-09-2012, 10:32 PM)Qwertygiy Wrote:
(01-09-2012, 09:19 PM)Paradox Wrote: I've been told that Roblox is still in alpha.

Then you were misinformed.

I see.


RE: About updates of buildism. - Monkeeyo - 01-10-2012

Minecraft is a different game from buildism. Maybe they had abit of luck? :S