Posts: 1,796
Threads: 387
Joined: Mar 2011
Reputation:
0
Therefore, controversy over a ban is allowed. Am I incorrect?
Posts: 2,617
Threads: 129
Joined: Jan 2013
Reputation:
0
Are you trying to outsmart the mods? Haha..
Posts: 5,683
Threads: 413
Joined: Aug 2012
Reputation:
0
So long as the bannee isn't doing any arguing.
Posts: 1,796
Threads: 387
Joined: Mar 2011
Reputation:
0
04-19-2011, 10:56 PM
(This post was last modified: 04-19-2011, 10:57 PM by 18cwatford.)
I think it all leads down to the definition of what spam is.
I suggest a few examples of what spam is in the rules post.
This is the dictionary definition:
"Send the same message indiscriminately to (large numbers of recipients) on the Internet."
That means the same exact message over and over. Not the same topic over and over. Due to this definition in place, the problem is the Moderation, Jacob_, and Kieron's definition of spam.
Posts: 1,796
Threads: 387
Joined: Mar 2011
Reputation:
0
You wrote that first one just to spite Kieron. Advertisement is NOT spam, it is junk mail. Plus I didn't find his advertisement that excessive.
If you must know I just looked up Spam on the online dictionary, the one that is updated.
If you want the other definition, it's meat.
Posts: 1,796
Threads: 387
Joined: Mar 2011
Reputation:
0
In ROBLOX's catalog that is copied/paste of the same thing. That is what spam is.
ROBLOX's community and it's mod force is rather corrupt with it's definitions of things such as trolling, personal attacking, and spam.
But I don't know, maybe I just tolerate too much stuff.
Posts: 3,112
Threads: 192
Joined: Apr 2011
Reputation:
0
I was the one who banned him, I will have no hesitation of doing it again if he spams (in my definition) again.