Do they still have that Bill that they can't show video games on Youtube?

[Fish]

I'm stuck on my new 3ds game. >.> P.s Is this a Chaos thread?

[noob007]

As long as it's a bill and not a law it doesn't affect you.

[Login]

The chaos thread is a sticky.

YouTube would have to be complete absolute (Excuse the language) retards (it had to be said) to allow that bill to pass. Companies like YouTube have a lot of their community as gaming, and Machinima and YouTube would never allow the bill to pass.

A Copyright states that the person who used it MUST credit the people who made it. Not make it not-usable/recordable.

[noob007]

The chaos thread is a sticky.

YouTube would have to be complete absolute (Excuse the language) retards (it had to be said) to allow that bill to pass. Companies like YouTube have a lot of their community as gaming, and Machinima and YouTube would never allow the bill to pass.

A Copyright states that the person who used it MUST credit the people who made it. Not make it not-usable/recordable.

They don't care if Youtube likes it or not.

[Login]

The chaos thread is a sticky.

YouTube would have to be complete absolute (Excuse the language) retards (it had to be said) to allow that bill to pass. Companies like YouTube have a lot of their community as gaming, and Machinima and YouTube would never allow the bill to pass.

A Copyright states that the person who used it MUST credit the people who made it. Not make it not-usable/recordable.

They don't care if Youtube likes it or not.

YouTube has the money to hire the best lawyers. A copyright is what I just mentioned in the quote, thus making that law unjust.

[noob007]

The chaos thread is a sticky.

YouTube would have to be complete absolute (Excuse the language) retards (it had to be said) to allow that bill to pass. Companies like YouTube have a lot of their community as gaming, and Machinima and YouTube would never allow the bill to pass.

A Copyright states that the person who used it MUST credit the people who made it. Not make it not-usable/recordable.

They don't care if Youtube likes it or not.

YouTube has the money to hire the best lawyers. A copyright is what I just mentioned in the quote, thus making that law unjust.

But lawyers don't pass laws. It's up to the congressmen.

[Login]

The chaos thread is a sticky.

YouTube would have to be complete absolute (Excuse the language) retards (it had to be said) to allow that bill to pass. Companies like YouTube have a lot of their community as gaming, and Machinima and YouTube would never allow the bill to pass.

A Copyright states that the person who used it MUST credit the people who made it. Not make it not-usable/recordable.

They don't care if Youtube likes it or not.

YouTube has the money to hire the best lawyers. A copyright is what I just mentioned in the quote, thus making that law unjust.

But lawyers don't pass laws. It's up to the congressmen.

If that law is passed, then their lawyers will be straight on that case is what I'm saying.