There should be this new rule on skins

[Slender]

Yes, taking a skin and just dumping it through Colorize two dozen times is quick, cheap, spammy, and not very worthwhile.

But do we expect everyone to want to wear the same superhero cape? To have the same colored sweater? To have identical pants?

As long as enough effort is put into the details and none of the variations are too similar to each other, I think it's fine. Is it really that much effort to look past 10 items in a 50-item-per-page catalog with only 2 pages?

Aslong as the skin has some different characteristic, I don't mind. Like I said, if it's the EXACT SAME THING with changed color, it should be considered as spam.

[Duck]

So basically no skin retextures.

I support.

arent all skins technically retextures

[Jacob__mybb_import1]

Recolors are fine, as long as you don't recolor someone else's skin without giving them credit.

[Slender]

So basically no skin retextures.

I support.

arent all skins technically retextures

There's a difference between a retexture or a fullblown copy.

[Walrus]

Like: "Don't post the same exact skin with colors modified, it's still the same thing."

This is such a retarded suggestion.
I wouldn't classify skin re-textures or skin modifications as "spam", that's silly.

[Slender]

Like: "Don't post the same exact skin with colors modified, it's still the same thing."

This is such a retarded suggestion.
I wouldn't classify skin re-textures or skin modifications as "spam", that's silly.

omg u used the r word ur gettin report -__-
I guess you missed the context of what I was saying huh?

[Archived_Latinxassassin]

Re**** is so overused, I wouldn't call it a bad word. But still, it shouldn't be called on people, but just on words.

[Guest]

Re**** is so overused, I wouldn't call it a bad word. But still, it shouldn't be called on people, but just on words.

They why censor it?