07-18-2011, 06:58 PM
(07-18-2011, 06:53 PM)noob007 Wrote:If that law is passed, then their lawyers will be straight on that case is what I'm saying.(07-18-2011, 06:52 PM)Login Wrote:(07-18-2011, 06:51 PM)noob007 Wrote:(07-18-2011, 06:49 PM)Login Wrote: The chaos thread is a sticky.
YouTube would have to be complete absolute (Excuse the language) retards (it had to be said) to allow that bill to pass. Companies like YouTube have a lot of their community as gaming, and Machinima and YouTube would never allow the bill to pass.
A Copyright states that the person who used it MUST credit the people who made it. Not make it not-usable/recordable.
They don't care if Youtube likes it or not.
YouTube has the money to hire the best lawyers. A copyright is what I just mentioned in the quote, thus making that law unjust.
But lawyers don't pass laws. It's up to the congressmen.
![[Image: poptartFINALTINY.gif]](http://www.prguitarman.com/icon/poptartFINALTINY.gif){kind=icon}
![[Image: log.png?t=1302647037]](http://i284.photobucket.com/albums/ll20/sonic3895/log.png?t=1302647037)