08-12-2011, 03:28 PM
Ming-Yan,
I took the opportunity to read all three of the threads that you linked me to. I'm going to get straight to the point: the first two threads don't prove a thing other than the fact that there was *some* tension a while back before any of this House & Order crap started. These two threads, however, don't help your case too much. There just isn't enough content inside of them to see that before any of this House & Order stuff, problems were already there. What I *do* see is tension building, but that's about it.
As to the third thread you posted, I do have to agree that this is a huge foreshadow of the problems that we have seen, but since you've only supplied me with one valid thread to use as a point, I simply cannot edit my thread's content to match with your main ideas. These were the *very* beginnings of the roots to the problems that we have been seeing, but in my thread, as I have attempted to make clear to you before our "debate" went too far, I was only talking about the recent roots, not the ones that are either no long with us (deleted), nor the ones from weeks ago. Please keep that in mind when responding to this thread again.
I do have a few questions or you, however. How many threads in total can you estimate were deleted? Please be specific and use evidence to backup your estimation.
Also, do you have any other proof that you could give me to review?
I am open to suggestions and feedback and even objection, but that is only on certain logical conditions. I would think that you would know these conditions by now. If you need me to restate them, let me know.
I gave my evidence already; why would I need to restate it again? My evidence has _nothing_ to do with other people agreeing with me, rather hard, cold evidence. Also, my evidence is backed up by people who know that what I say is correct. That's all that my evidence is and ever will be in the future.
I took the opportunity to read all three of the threads that you linked me to. I'm going to get straight to the point: the first two threads don't prove a thing other than the fact that there was *some* tension a while back before any of this House & Order crap started. These two threads, however, don't help your case too much. There just isn't enough content inside of them to see that before any of this House & Order stuff, problems were already there. What I *do* see is tension building, but that's about it.
As to the third thread you posted, I do have to agree that this is a huge foreshadow of the problems that we have seen, but since you've only supplied me with one valid thread to use as a point, I simply cannot edit my thread's content to match with your main ideas. These were the *very* beginnings of the roots to the problems that we have been seeing, but in my thread, as I have attempted to make clear to you before our "debate" went too far, I was only talking about the recent roots, not the ones that are either no long with us (deleted), nor the ones from weeks ago. Please keep that in mind when responding to this thread again.
I do have a few questions or you, however. How many threads in total can you estimate were deleted? Please be specific and use evidence to backup your estimation.
Also, do you have any other proof that you could give me to review?
I am open to suggestions and feedback and even objection, but that is only on certain logical conditions. I would think that you would know these conditions by now. If you need me to restate them, let me know.
I gave my evidence already; why would I need to restate it again? My evidence has _nothing_ to do with other people agreeing with me, rather hard, cold evidence. Also, my evidence is backed up by people who know that what I say is correct. That's all that my evidence is and ever will be in the future.
-CoderRyne
Ryne Thiel
Ryne Thiel