Is this game supposed to appeal to children?

[Victimus]

I think us kids are more interested in 3D games like ROBLOX...[/font]

[Invader]

Not really.
Some little kids have stumbled upon this site, but left quickly due to the high amount of older people.

[Ghosty]

There's a 13-and-up registering limit, or at least there used to be. So technically, nope

And really, you do have to be a kid to truly enjoy R.

[Oak]

I started playing 2DWorlds when I was 13 which was when it was called Buildism last January.
This is not really a site appealing to kids, it's more physics based.
I'm 14 now and turning 15 in September.
I love it here.

[ijfeswijfae]

it's more physics based.

Push box.

Box moves.

Stop pushing box.

Box doesn't move.

Shit, this Newton law stuff is way too much complex physics for me to handle.

[Oak]

it's more physics based.

Push box.

Box moves.

Stop pushing box.

Box doesn't move.

Shit, this Newton law stuff is way too much complex physics for me to handle.

Myem's mind = blown

[ijfeswijfae]

it's more physics based.

Push box.

Box moves.

Stop pushing box.

Box doesn't move.

Shit, this Newton law stuff is way too much complex physics for me to handle.

Myem's mind = blown

Don't forget who's the teacher and the student here.

Anyways, I don't see how 2dworlds is anymore physics based than ROBLOX.

[DysLabs]

3D isn't really appealing for me.
And roblox was crap. I remeber trying to get the block in the right spot. But no. There always was that little imperfection that didn't allow it.
2D building > 3D building