Who Thinks the Ad should be to the Side?
#1
In the centre, it looks...tiny.
[Image: siggggg.gif?t=1312782506]

[Image: signature.png?t=1312081740]
Reply
#2
(06-12-2011, 02:47 AM)Ming-Yan Wrote: In the centre, it looks...tiny.

If it was on the side we would have to stretch the pages honestly I like it the way it is.
[Image: cxAECR.png]
[Image: r8umfc.gif]
Reply
#3
(06-12-2011, 02:51 AM)McNoobster Wrote:
(06-12-2011, 02:47 AM)Ming-Yan Wrote: In the centre, it looks...tiny.

If it was on the side we would have to stretch the pages honestly I like it the way it is.

I agree.
Reply
#4
Same place but to the side, not skyscraper.
REALLY?
[Image: siggggg.gif?t=1312782506]

[Image: signature.png?t=1312081740]
Reply
#5
(06-12-2011, 02:51 AM)Ashely Wrote:
(06-12-2011, 02:51 AM)McNoobster Wrote:
(06-12-2011, 02:47 AM)Ming-Yan Wrote: In the centre, it looks...tiny.

If it was on the side we would have to stretch the pages honestly I like it the way it is.

I agree.

If I had a say in it though I would say put it on the bottom of the page aswell so we could get more ad loads which would give us more money. Atleast I think thats how it works.
[Image: cxAECR.png]
[Image: r8umfc.gif]
Reply
#6
(06-12-2011, 02:52 AM)Ming-Yan Wrote: Same place but to the side, not skysc[censored]r.
REALLY?

Lol, censored.
Reply
#7
I don't think that it will stretch the page. A skyscraper ad is only 600px in height.
Reply
#8
I don't think that it will stretch the page. A skyscraper ad is only 600px in height.
Reply
#9
(06-12-2011, 02:55 AM)AK-47 Wrote: I don't think that it will stretch the page. A skysc[censored]r ad is only 600px in height.

Were not talking about in hieght we are talking about in width.
[Image: cxAECR.png]
[Image: r8umfc.gif]
Reply
#10
OREALLYNAO?

Before it blocked gra pe on one of my comments, but now skyscr aper?
Oh, it's only 90px in width, also.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)