Posts: 273
Threads: 47
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 420
Threads: 93
Joined: Apr 2011
Reputation:
0
Lolwut? 0.999 = 0.999. Herp, Derp. ^_^
Posts: 1,796
Threads: 387
Joined: Mar 2011
Reputation:
0
06-24-2011, 04:54 PM
(This post was last modified: 06-24-2011, 04:54 PM by 18cwatford.)
@Lol
In that equation, the .999 is rounded and is not accounted for.
Think about it.
99999999999999999...
10000000000000000...
is not the same as
1
1
Posts: 1,796
Threads: 387
Joined: Mar 2011
Reputation:
0
06-24-2011, 05:05 PM
(This post was last modified: 06-24-2011, 05:06 PM by 18cwatford.)
That is COMPLETELY INCORRECT.
It doesn't work because 9.999... is not rational and therefore when multiplied is rounded.
You can tell the rounding error by plugging it back in.
10(1) =/= 9.999...
why? because 10 does not equal 9.999...
Didn't teachers tell kids to check their answers by plugging it back in?
Also this would appear as invalid in a calculator because a variable cannot have 2 numbers unless they are the same.
You cannot have X as .999 and as 1, they are different numbers. [unless it is a quadratic which it is not]
Which leads to another point, don't trust wikipedia.
Posts: 1,796
Threads: 387
Joined: Mar 2011
Reputation:
0
Like I said, even if the first 2 equations check, if one doesn't...there was an error.
10(1) =/= 9.999... no matter how you slice it.
X cannot equal 2 numbers unless a quadratic and a quadratic that consists of 1 would only be X = -1, 1.
X = 1 and .999... is an invalid answer to any equation unless rounded.
There was a rounding error when 10 was multiplied to an irrational number.
That's like saying 10Ï€ is the same as 31.4, it's not. Pi is irrational and therefore would be rounded when trying to multiply it.
Posts: 823
Threads: 75
Joined: Apr 2011
Reputation:
0
Think of it as being infinitely close to 1.
Something that is *infinitely* close to something, is that thing.