My siggy predicted the future.

[Slendurrman]

I don't follow the rules.

I'm just trying to make buildism a better place.

If your not going to follow our rules your not making Buldism a better place.

Why yes I actually am.

Since not following the rules gets you closer to being perma-IP banned, you're actually sort of right.

Cool! I guess I should start following the rules.

Does that mean I can do anything that's not stated in the rules?

Just get banned already, your worse then kieron, and I didn't think that was possible.

[Blandflakes]

If your not going to follow our rules your not making Buldism a better place.

Why yes I actually am.

Since not following the rules gets you closer to being perma-IP banned, you're actually sort of right.

Cool! I guess I should start following the rules.

Does that mean I can do anything that's not stated in the rules?

Just get banned already, your worse then kieron, and I didn't think that was possible.

Aye, I shan't ever be banned! For I shall follow the rules now.... well most of the time.

[Ming-Yan]

Um...Hitler was trying to make the world a better place. Literally, he thought what he was doing was right.

However, I have to agree, testing rules is what makes the site and community stronger.

[Blandflakes]

Um...Hitler was trying to make the world a better place. Literally, he thought what he was doing was right.

However, I have to agree, testing rules is what makes the site an community stronger.

Yeah, without my binary swearin' the post only in english rule wouldn't be around

[Jacob__mybb_import1]

Testing rules is just seeing how close you can get to a rule without breaking it. It's against the rules, since it usually ends up getting ridiculous (like when someone made progressively smaller bikinis to test the no nude skins rule, until it was just tiny triangles covering the naughty bits...)

Lots of the rule changes happen when someone does something that isn't even mentioned in the rules. This isn't testing the rules, and we won't punish them with the new rule after adding it, since that would be unfair.

[Ming-Yan]

Testing rules is just seeing how close you can get to a rule without breaking it. It's against the rules, since it usually ends up getting ridiculous (like when someone made progressively smaller bikinis to test the no nude skins rule, until it was just tiny triangles covering the naughty bits...)

Lots of the rule changes happen when someone does something that isn't even mentioned in the rules. This isn't testing the rules, and we won't punish them with the new rule after adding it, since that would be unfair.

Well what I am essentially saying is "Come at me bro".
I like a nice debate that has a compromised outcome. Abruptly ending something doesn't seem to help much considering people still carrying the subject [even if it is against the rules].

Plus all of the locks look bad.

[AK-47]

"I like a nice debate that has a compromised outcome."
Debate forum section please...

~on-topic~
Just, eugh, follow the rules. They were placed there to maintain peace, and to prevent the unneeded drama.

However, I have to agree, testing rules is what makes the site and community stronger."

He didn't really have to test the rule. He just needed to tell a mod/Jacob_ a loophole in the rules via PM.

Also, were you trying to compare Hitler's ambition with Glome's?

[Excel]

Glome's right.

Since when?

Always, Moron.
_____________________
edit: I call you moron because you call me names and get away with it. Moron.

[Paradox]

Glome's right.

Since when?

Always, Moron.

Aww, come one. Don't be such a hypocrite.

[Duck]

Glome's right.

Since when?

Always, Moron.
_____________________
edit: I call you moron because you call me names and get away with it. Moron.

Calm down, moron.