Posts: 1,033
Threads: 59
Joined: Oct 2011
Reputation:
0
Don't take any of that personally. We were trying to think of only the most trustworthy, productive people who were still active. None of it means we don't like you (or anyone else).
Posts: 2,843
Threads: 382
Joined: Jul 2012
Reputation:
0
Back then I wasn't planning on making the site known to Buildism until we started advertising (and bringing in a huge flood of people), so making sure we didn't invite anyone that would do anything slightly non-productive was important. It doesn't mean that we don't like you, just that you weren't in the top 5 or so people that we decided to invite. This was going to be advertised heavily only a few weeks after those messages were posted, so we needed a limited number of people that were going to be focused on making stuff and nothing else.
So we weren't discussing who was going to be allowed in, just the "launch team" so to speak.
Posts: 1,089
Threads: 52
Joined: Apr 2011
Reputation:
0
The way that post came across doesn't go as you sound, Jacob_.
If you read it carefully, that post makes it seem as if
'We are only allowing these people in, capisce?'
Posts: 816
Threads: 40
Joined: Nov 2012
Reputation:
0
Were did you get that from? o.0