RE: Java vs. C++ - Goopler - 08-16-2012
No it was not. I support java, minecraft made with java is "k" for me but c++ is actually much better then Java. You can create more realistic games with c++.
RE: Java vs. C++ - DysLabs - 08-16-2012
(08-16-2012, 04:18 PM)Goopler Wrote: No it was not. I support java, minecraft made with java is "k" for me but c++ is actually much better then Java. You can create more realistic games with c++.
But "Minecraft is written is Java" =/= to what you just said
RE: Java vs. C++ - charles - 08-27-2012
(08-16-2012, 04:18 PM)Goopler Wrote: No it was not. I support java, minecraft made with java is "k" for me but c++ is actually much better then Java. You can create more realistic games with c++.
The reason why Java is "slower" is because it runs in a virtual environment. It's processing much more during runtime than your average application would in C++. If you manage your scenes and your drawing calls correctly, you shouldn't have a problem.
RE: Java vs. C++ - noob007 - 08-27-2012
But the non-determinism of Java's GC can make it really hard to optimize big games.
RE: Java vs. C++ - Hippo - 08-27-2012
(08-16-2012, 04:18 PM)Goopler Wrote: No it was not. I support java, minecraft made with java is "k" for me but c++ is actually much better then Java. You can create more realistic games with c++.
so you prefer java but say c++ is better
wat
RE: Java vs. C++ - DysLabs - 08-27-2012
(08-27-2012, 07:11 PM)Hippo Wrote: (08-16-2012, 04:18 PM)Goopler Wrote: No it was not. I support java, minecraft made with java is "k" for me but c++ is actually much better then Java. You can create more realistic games with c++.
so you prefer java but say c++ is better
wat
I don't think he's thinking about he is posting.
RE: Java vs. C++ - Guest - 08-30-2012
I don't think he thinks when he posts*
|