Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Reminder: Complaining about moderators, or mod actions, is against the rules.
#21
Do your job?

Yes, you do your job.

Do you do it properly?

No.
#22
Thanks for the constructive critism.
Hello
#23
(06-01-2012, 04:59 PM)Qwertygiy Wrote: Why can we not get it into your head?

THE FIRST AMENDMENT PROHIBITS THE US GOVERNMENT FROM MAKING A LAW ABRDIGING THE FREEDOM OF SPEECH.

THE TENTH AMENDMENT ALLOWS THE PEOPLE TO MAKE ANY RULES THEY SEE FIT AS LONG AS THEY DO NOT CONTRADICT ANY EXISTING LAWS.

THE PEOPLE (THE MODERATION TEAM OF BUILDISM, IN THIS CASE) HAVE MADE A RULE STATING THAT YOU CANNOT POST INSULTING MATERIAL ABOUT ANOTHER USER.

THE MODERATION TEAM OF BUILDISM IS NOT THE US GOVERNMENT.

Those 2 laws contradict eachother.

And remember, thanks to the English invention of the WWW, you also follow British Laws, which cancels out the both of those laws.

One of the laws here in the UK state plainly, as long as we don't plan to overthrow anyone's position or violate human rights, we are free to do as we please.

Aslong as we don't try to get Ashely out of the Moderation team so we can take it, we're fine.

Aslong as we don't racially, sexually or abusively harass Ashely, we're fine.
#24
They do not contradict each other. The UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT cannot create a UNITED STATES LAW that abridges freedom of speech.

Is THAT clear enough for you?
#25
(06-01-2012, 05:05 PM)Qwertygiy Wrote: They do not contradict each other. The UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT cannot create a UNITED STATES LAW that abridges freedom of speech.

Is THAT clear enough for you?

Yes, they do.

The BRITISH GOVERNMENT allow this sorta thing as long as your intention is not to overthrow or harm.
#26
Go ahead, post a link showing the ENTIRE law. Because I'm pretty sure that like you just totally misread the constitution, you've misread it.
#27
Qwerty, it will go on and on with this kid. Please take this to the debate section of you two are going to go back and fourth.
Hello
#28
He's left, at least for today. Anyway there's no point in it, because apparently he overlooks or decides not to read the important parts even when I'm pointing them out in all caps, bold and underline. There's no way to win an argument if your opponent is plugging his ears.


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)