08-16-2012, 04:18 PM
No it was not. I support java, minecraft made with java is "k" for me but c++ is actually much better then Java. You can create more realistic games with c++.
Java vs. C++
|
08-16-2012, 04:18 PM
No it was not. I support java, minecraft made with java is "k" for me but c++ is actually much better then Java. You can create more realistic games with c++.
08-16-2012, 04:19 PM
(08-16-2012, 04:18 PM)Goopler Wrote: No it was not. I support java, minecraft made with java is "k" for me but c++ is actually much better then Java. You can create more realistic games with c++. But "Minecraft is written is Java" =/= to what you just said
08-27-2012, 04:09 PM
(08-16-2012, 04:18 PM)Goopler Wrote: No it was not. I support java, minecraft made with java is "k" for me but c++ is actually much better then Java. You can create more realistic games with c++. The reason why Java is "slower" is because it runs in a virtual environment. It's processing much more during runtime than your average application would in C++. If you manage your scenes and your drawing calls correctly, you shouldn't have a problem.
08-27-2012, 04:14 PM
But the non-determinism of Java's GC can make it really hard to optimize big games.
08-27-2012, 07:11 PM
(08-16-2012, 04:18 PM)Goopler Wrote: No it was not. I support java, minecraft made with java is "k" for me but c++ is actually much better then Java. You can create more realistic games with c++. so you prefer java but say c++ is better wat True beauty.
08-27-2012, 07:48 PM
(08-27-2012, 07:11 PM)Hippo Wrote:(08-16-2012, 04:18 PM)Goopler Wrote: No it was not. I support java, minecraft made with java is "k" for me but c++ is actually much better then Java. You can create more realistic games with c++. I don't think he's thinking about he is posting.
08-30-2012, 09:14 PM
I don't think he thinks when he posts*
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|