Why isn't this game more popular?!
#11
(03-29-2012, 05:27 AM)Ashely Wrote: Bet if he was on it it would be Organized to him....

I would be organized if we didn't have useless mods who haven't read the rules.
[Image: paperboy.PNG]
True beauty.
Reply
#12
(03-30-2012, 07:45 AM)Hippo Wrote:
(03-29-2012, 05:27 AM)Ashely Wrote: Bet if he was on it it would be Organized to him....

I would be organized if we didn't have useless mods who haven't read the rules.

Post your agreements and proof here!

1. Ban me for personal attack and cussing. But not ban BG.
Reply
#13
(03-30-2012, 04:48 PM)Kieron Wrote:
(03-30-2012, 07:45 AM)Hippo Wrote:
(03-29-2012, 05:27 AM)Ashely Wrote: Bet if he was on it it would be Organized to him....

I would be organized if we didn't have useless mods who haven't read the rules.

Post your agreements and proof here!

1. Ban me for personal attack and cussing. But not ban BG.

Hold it hold it!

*tires screech*

BG hasn't attacked anyone on the site yet. He HAS been warned a few times about his posts, and some have been locked/deleted, but he hasn't personally-attacked any Buildist as far as I know.
Reply
#14
(03-30-2012, 04:54 PM)Qwertygiy Wrote:
(03-30-2012, 04:48 PM)Kieron Wrote:
(03-30-2012, 07:45 AM)Hippo Wrote:
(03-29-2012, 05:27 AM)Ashely Wrote: Bet if he was on it it would be Organized to him....

I would be organized if we didn't have useless mods who haven't read the rules.

Post your agreements and proof here!

1. Ban me for personal attack and cussing. But not ban BG.

Hold it hold it!

*tires screech*

BG hasn't attacked anyone on the site yet. He HAS been warned a few times about his posts, and some have been locked/deleted, but he hasn't personally-attacked any Buildist as far as I know.

-.-

Threatened mass murder of babies.

Insulted groups of people and their beliefs(A new Eisenhower!)

Racism

And the list goes on.
Reply
#15
I dislike it as much as you do, but is this really the time or place to start an argument over "lunacy is not directly against the rules"?
Reply
#16
(03-30-2012, 05:19 PM)Qwertygiy Wrote: I dislike it as much as you do, but is this really the time or place to start an argument over "lunacy is not directly against the rules"?

It should be.

And if it's not lunacy and he's joking, then it's meaningless spam.

[not attempting to start an arguement]
[Image: paperboy.PNG]
True beauty.
Reply
#17
(03-30-2012, 06:07 PM)Hippo Wrote:
(03-30-2012, 05:19 PM)Qwertygiy Wrote: I dislike it as much as you do, but is this really the time or place to start an argument over "lunacy is not directly against the rules"?

It should be.

And if it's not lunacy and he's joking, then it's meaningless spam.

[not attempting to start an arguement]

This.

And let's call him RR from now on.
Reply
#18
(03-30-2012, 04:59 PM)Kieron Wrote:
(03-30-2012, 04:54 PM)Qwertygiy Wrote:
(03-30-2012, 04:48 PM)Kieron Wrote:
(03-30-2012, 07:45 AM)Hippo Wrote:
(03-29-2012, 05:27 AM)Ashely Wrote: Bet if he was on it it would be Organized to him....

I would be organized if we didn't have useless mods who haven't read the rules.

Post your agreements and proof here!

1. Ban me for personal attack and cussing. But not ban BG.

Hold it hold it!

*tires screech*

BG hasn't attacked anyone on the site yet. He HAS been warned a few times about his posts, and some have been locked/deleted, but he hasn't personally-attacked any Buildist as far as I know.

-.-

Threatened mass murder of babies.

Insulted groups of people and their beliefs(A new Eisenhower!)

Racism

And the list goes on.

hurr durr whats a troll hurr
Reply
#19
Wait, whats BG?
Reply
#20
(04-02-2012, 11:03 PM)Excel Wrote: Wait, whats BG?

BuildistGuard, formerly Testerrocksroblox.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)